🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial action to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and guardians are watching closely to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of states are considering comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that mobile devices and apps are "taking away our youngsters' youth". The policy could be passed next year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "one of the tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to pass a law raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a similar action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in the Netherlands has urged families to block their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has passed a advisory resolution demanding a ban for minors without guardian approval is given. While it warns of the "addictive" quality of these services, the move does not create binding law.

"A strong age restriction is a solid foundation," commented the European lawmaker behind the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any action must be "grounded in robust evidence".

Previously, momentum grew behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the government committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after encountering dangerous online content argues that a strict age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the Silicon Valley to design platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for young users," said a leading peer.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, action is largely happening at the state level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah mandates adult approval for under-18s to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting teenagers to one hour of social media time per day, with extra access dependent on adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed measures requiring guardian approval for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from certain figures to mimic Australia's path, a federal ban is currently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from the West, additional nations are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, global bodies strike a more measured position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "could backfire". The body highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize user protection.

While this worldwide debate unfolds, the policies of this nation and others indicate that governments globally are increasingly content to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.